Bagless Vacuums And Dust…?
ByI bought a Sears (Kenmore brand) and thought the concept was good vacuum, and then dump in the dirt and rubbish good to go. However. . . I think that sucks cause Bagless dust that when I use my old Kenmore vacuum bags required to change, if everyone in a while.
Anybody any suggestions? I often either in the tube in the garbage dump and should be hitting the filter (and often hand-pick the bits of dust filter). . . . It should not be difficult, but I really do not see the wonders of the VAC Bagless?
Who else?
Thanks in advance.
4 Comments
August 6th, 2009 at 5:25 am
I used to have a bagless but now I have an Oreck. Oreck has been the best vacuum I have ever purchased. It does have a bag but when removed there is a cover that puls shut when in the process of exchanging bags. I used to have a wind tunnel and that was the worst vacuum I have ever owned. It was expensive in cost and in quality was not empressive. Plus it broke a mew months later. Go Oreck if at all possible, I have not switched up from it for 4 years now and it still works. Plus it came with a cordless iron and a compact totable vacuum cleaner which is awesome for doing steps and vehicles.
August 6th, 2009 at 5:59 am
Yeah…they suck. (really) I would stick with the bags.
August 6th, 2009 at 6:27 am
well i have a bissel bagless and its the best vacuum that i have ever owned. i dont have a problem with dust flying all over the place. when u empty it put the container down in the trash can then empty it. and as for the filter i can clean mine under water and no dust. i would never own another bagged vacuum. they make ur house stink. plus they dont really pick up dirt.
August 6th, 2009 at 7:01 am
Yes they make a mess.
I know! You can get a vacuum with a bag and suck all the remnants out of the bagless vac